On-Line but Off-Track

March 1, 2013

The next time I’m  sitting through yet another talk encouraging us to move courses online because “our students lives are so complicated”, I’ll raise my hand and ask what Those So Encouraging us have read this Columbia Teachers’ College study on who is and isn’t successful in on-line learning:

While all types of students in the study suffered decrements in performance in online courses, some struggled more than others to adapt: males, younger students, Black students, and students with lower grade point averages.

I understand that on-line learning comes in many forms and that we’re only beginning to explore the potential of digital learning to equalize opportunity.

But we know that college is about so much more than eventually getting the right answers on the test, and sitting alone at your computer screen — even with the best “social” features of a course management system — will never afford students new to college the sense of belonging and visibility that evaded so many of us in our early years in college classrooms.

I’ve been in many conversations lately about supporting first generation college students. Inevitably, these conversations turn to ideas about “supporting” these students, from creating supports for addressing presumed academic deficits to building mentorship programs to help students navigate the many unwritten rules of success in college.   All are good.

Yet in all of these conversations, I’ve also be aware of the nagging realities of class on campus:

First, we are now witnessing a two tiered system of higher education in which wealthier students compete for admissions to a relatively small number of competitive elite colleges, while poor and working class students attend community colleges  and less competitive state schools.    No education can be complete without regular, sustained, and deliberate encounters with difference.   No education can be complete without daily reminders that others experience the world on much different terms that you do.

Second, the conversations almost always assume that first-generation students are fragile hot house flowers, ready to wilt at under the pressures of school.   There is almost no conversation about the multiple daily “micro” slights that remind first generation students that even after admission, they must earn their place in college in daily dances around money, status, and experiences from which one has been excluded. The thing that shut me up in college was not my lack of academic preparation; it was instead realizing in the first few weeks that so many of the other students had travelled, read things, eaten things, volunteered places that, until that point, were completely invisible to me.  I knew that at any turn, my ignorance would be apparent and I’d be judged for it, even while I was doing fine on the academic work.

But there is almost no conversation about the resilience that students can develop, about the things learned from becoming keen observers of the taken-for-granted social norms, of the righteous anger that can grow over economic injustice.

So this week, I read How Much Do You Pay for College  in the Chronicle, and was relieved to learn of student organizations that are fostering open and sometimes difficult conversations about class differences on campus.  For example:

Middlebury could have created a support group for working-class students, the type of program found on many other campuses. But Koplinka-Loehr intentionally wanted something different—an organization that promotes dialogue between working-class and wealthy students, that “makes the conversation a lot harder” but ultimately more meaningful, he explained.

I’m encouraged by this vision of moving conversations about first-generation students’ experiences out of “support groups” behind closed meeting room doors and into the open.   I’m encouraged by the idea that we might finally come to frame the conversations as being fundamentally about class and privilege and the many ways that students new to college have to fight for the right to stay — with their dignity intact.

There have been many tweets and Facebook postings about Sunday’s  NYT article on low-income students and the obstacles they face getting to college.  The detailed reporting on the three high-achieving girls, their mentor, and the multiple things that got in their way has generated over 1200 comments to date, many of them surprisingly empathetic.

Some thoughts, after thinking about this piece for a few days:

1.  The article ran on the front page of my edition of the times, and while I’m grateful for the conversation,  I am dismayed that the deep connection between social class and college access is still front page news.

2.  In any article like this, the obtuse financial aid form — the FAFSA — is critiqued, yet promised revisions that don’t “require a Ph.D.” are nowhere on the horizon.

3. While the personalization of the bigger story is compelling, the much bigger picture of deep institutional classism can too easily get lost in talk about bad boyfriends, an indifferent college administrator, and complex families.  Middle class students may experience any of those things and yet still thrive in college and beyond.

Thoughts about the ways that these young women were portrayed in the article?

 

Inside Higher Education just published this interesting essay on how colleges might better service First Generation Students.

I deeply appreciate the attention on the complex journey of being “First”.  I appreciate the acknowledgement that first generation students are survivors.

Yet I struggle with the sense that  “survivor” implies victimhood.  Or perhaps, I struggle with how we can generate conversation about the challenges (clearly, often created by policies and practices that work against the interests of these students ) as well as the many strengths that First Generation students bring to our classrooms.

And I’d welcome more attention on the positive work ethic, the straightforwardness, the resiliency and the many other positive attributes of many First-Generation students, as these are things that all students (and their faculty) would do well to emulate.

I’ll be ordering the book today.   Does anyone want to read it together (virtually)?

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers